On December 26, 2003, the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) deliberately shot at Gil Namati, a 21 year old Israeli protestor that demonstrated against the separation fence/wall. Gil was shot in both legs by two live bullets. The incident created a media storm and raised many question. What would have happened if the IDF didn’t lie about the shooting of Gil Namati. Would it have justified the actions taken by the security forces? Is there a difference between shooting a Jew and a non-Jew? This film is divided into three parts, the first part presents the investigation which was shown at the press conference and proved the IDF was lying about the reasons for the shooting, the second part criticizes the investigation itself and how the media reacted and portrayed the incident and the separation barrier, and the third part is a propaganda piece about the “danger” the anarchists poses in Israel.
You may also like this
Renegade Lawyer a Thorn in the Side of Israel’s Banking EliteJefferson Smith
How Israel Screwed Both Palestinian Refugees & Iraqi JewsYehouda Shenhav
Would You Go Down On Your Enemy If It Would Bring Peace?Sleeping With the Enemy
Sh*tting on the Israeli Flag: The Art of Natali Cohen VaxbergDavid Sheen | Alternet
Kafka in Palestine: Settlers Build On His Land & Serve Him A Tax BillFiranzi al-Kafkawi
Iconoclast Artist Slams Israeli Leaders With Puerile PoetryNatali Cohen Vaxberg